Thursday, February 12, 2026
Thursday, February 12, 2026

Outsourcing of 24,000 government jobs a socio-economic disaster: Sajjad Gani Lone

JNM journalist Hardeep Jamwal | Jammu

The political temperature in Jammu and Kashmir has risen sharply. During the budget debate in the Assembly, People’s Conference president and MLA Sajjad Gani Lone launched a scathing attack on the government, calling the outsourcing of 24,000 government positions a “social and economic disaster.”
Lone directly questioned the government, asking why it wasn’t being abolished now that the government has come to power, when it was opposed during the Lieutenant Governor’s rule. He alleged that the entire system is being run under pressure from the bureaucracy and at the behest of bureaucrats.

Why isn’t the government reversing the outsourcing system?
Sajjad Gani Lone said that the government’s official response clearly states that 24,000 government jobs have been outsourced in Jammu and Kashmir. This not only threatens the future of the youth but will also prove detrimental to social balance.

He said, “This system will weaken society. By providing temporary and insecure employment instead of permanent jobs, the government itself is pushing the future of its youth into darkness.”

Need for Decentralization, Disadvantages of Centralization
Lone also questioned the current administrative structure, saying that Jammu and Kashmir must move away from excessive centralization and toward decentralization. He said that in the current system, decisions are being made in files and offices rather than by the public.

This Budget is a Bureaucratic Budget
Commenting on the budget, the People’s Conference chief said that this budget is not prepared by an elected government, but entirely by the bureaucracy.

He said that when an elected government comes to power, its political and social vision is reflected in the budget, but the current budget shows no such influence.

The government was also cornered on the gas cylinder scheme.
Sajad Gani Lone also criticized the government for its election promise to provide 12 LPG cylinders to the economically weaker sections. He alleged that the government’s current announcement neither matches the election manifesto nor the ground reality.
Lone said that the government has excluded 1.4 million BPL families, now called priority families, from this scheme. Furthermore, by reducing the subsidy on diesel, the cost of gas cylinders is being indirectly recovered from the public.
Annual Expenditure of Rs. 1,680 Crore to Provide 12 Cylinders
The People’s Conference president, presenting figures, said that the government needs Rs. 1,680 crore annually to provide 12 gas cylinders to families from the weaker sections.
This cost would reach Rs. 8,500 crore over five years, while the government is currently spending only Rs. 120–130 crore annually. Even in the next three years, this amount will only increase to a maximum of 350-400 crore rupees, which is far less than the stated promises.
Government cornered on issues related to youth and the poor
Sajjad Ghani Lone’s statements regarding outsourcing, employment, the budget, and public welfare schemes appear to be increasing pressure on the government. The opposition says that if these policies are not reconsidered in time, it could have serious social and political consequences.

Hot this week

AP TET 2024: Answer Key for Day 1 exam to be OUT today at aptet.apcfss.in; Check 5-steps to download here

P TET Answer Key 2024: The School Education Department,...

Army brings hope to remote J&K village: Young Boy finds his voice after 8 years of silence

Kathua: 16 Aug 2025: For eight years, Akshay Sharma,...

SSP Jammu holds security review meeting ahead of Independence Day 2025

JAMMU: SSP Jammu, Joginder Singh, JKPS chaired a virtual...

Person impersonating as RTO arrested from Jammu’s Miran Sahib

JAMMU, 12 August 2025: A major fraud was busted...

Hard-core criminal arrested with weapons by Samba Police

Samba, August 19, 2025: Samba Police has achieved a...

Shock to 3,800 MNREGA workers: Government says no proposal for regularization

JNM journalist Hardeep Jamwal | Jammu The Jammu and Kashmir...

Does central government schemes account for 70% of Jammu and Kashmir’s budget?

JNM journalist Hardeep Jamwal, Jammu An analysis of the latest...

23,000 government jobs are welcome, but what about the remaining 600,000 youth?

JNM journalist Hardeep Jamwal, Jammu Amidst rising unemployment in Jammu...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

Previous article
Congress’s big question on the SASKI scheme: “One lakh crore rupees unused, then why new loans?”JNM journalist Hardeep Jamwal, JammuPolitical debate has intensified in Jammu and Kashmir over the government’s decision to take new loans under the Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment (SASKI) scheme. State Congress Committee President Tariq Kara, while sharply questioning the government in the Assembly, asked why new loans were needed when nearly one lakh crore rupees were already lying unused.During the budget discussion, Tariq Kara claimed that only 12 percent of the total budget had been spent on capital expenditure so far. He questioned the government’s financial priorities, saying that taking additional loans without properly utilizing available funds could push Jammu and Kashmir into unnecessary financial burden.The Congress President warned that rising debt could weigh heavily on the state’s economy in the future. He demanded the government clarify its concrete plans for the effective utilization of existing funds and the implementation of development projects.Tariq Kara also expressed concern that the assets of Jammu and Kashmir could be at risk through private companies under the guise of the SASKI loan scheme. He said that there is confusion and concern among the public regarding the scheme’s provisions, on which the government should provide a clear answer in the Assembly.The Congress leader stressed that capital expenditure is the backbone of infrastructure development and employment generation, but the lack of proper utilization of resources raises questions about both the government’s intentions and policies.